
Every product team faces the same formidable challenge: a sprawling backlog containing dozens, if not hundreds, of potential features, bug fixes, and improvements. How do you decide what to tackle first? What truly deserves your team's immediate attention, and what can patiently wait? The answer lies in a structured approach to assessing feature value.
The core idea is surprisingly simple: you need to evaluate each task against two fundamental scales:
Estimating complexity, at least approximately, usually presents fewer hurdles. We can gauge the number of human-hours required, and if the scope is too vague, we provide an initial estimate, noting potential risks. At this stage, the goal isn't necessarily pinpoint accuracy, but rather a relative comparison to other tasks.
Assessing value, however, is a more multifaceted and challenging endeavor. Value isn't monolithic; it exists on a spectrum from immediately quantifiable gains to long-term strategic benefits.
Quantifying this type of value can be challenging, as its financial impact might be delayed or indirect. This is where leadership – typically the founder or CEO – must consult their internal compass. How much do they personally value these intangible indicators? What proportion of the company's overall value is attributed to user loyalty, and how significantly might a particular task influence it? While acknowledging that "our users' love is priceless," it's vital to strive for a realistic assessment.
Once you have estimated both the value (in whatever unit you choose, even a subjective score) and the complexity (in human-hours) for each task, the next step is straightforward:
Divide the estimated Value by the estimated Complexity.
Then, sort your entire backlog by this resulting "Value-to-Complexity" ratio in descending order. This provides a robust, data-driven foundation for prioritizing tasks.
Of course, this isn't a purely mechanical process. Interdependencies between tasks must be considered, and common sense remains an indispensable tool. However, this method gives you a clear, objective starting point, moving your prioritization efforts far beyond random selection.
What if defining a precise, or even subjective, "value" for those intangible tasks proves too difficult? There's an alternative approach:
By implementing these strategies, you transform the daunting task of backlog management into a clear, purposeful exercise. You gain clarity, make informed decisions, and ensure your team is always working on what truly matters most for your product and business.